Μαθησιακά Αποτελέσματα:

Με την ολοκλήρωση του μαθήματος οι φοιτητές/τριες αναμένεται:

-Να αποκτήσουν κριτική κατανόηση στα ζητήματα εκπροσώπησης και ταυτότητας των διαφορετικών ομάδων στο διαδίκτυο.

-Να μπορούν να σκεφτούν κριτικά την αλληλεπίδραση τεχνολογίας, κοινωνίας και φύλου.

• Barbercheck, M. (2001). Mixed Messages: Men and Women in Advertisements in Science. In M. Wyer et al. (Eds.), Women, Science, and Technology: A Reader in Feminist Science Studies (pp. 117–131). Routledge.
• De Lauretis, T. (1991). Queer Theory. Gay and Lesbian Sexualities. Indiana University Press.
• Harding, S. (1986). The Science Question in Feminism. Cornell University Press.
• Harding, S. (1992). Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology. What Is “Strong Objectivity”? The Centennial Review, 36(3), 437–470. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23739232
• Harding, S. (2004). The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies. Routledge.
• Lagesen, V. A. (2007). The Strength of Numbers: Strategies to Include Women into Computer
• Science.          Social    Studies of            Science,                37,          67–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312706063788
• Ormrod, S. (1994). “Let’s Nuke the Dinner”: Discursive Practices of Gender in the Creation of a New Cooking Process. In C. Cockburn & R. First-Dilić (Eds.), Bringing Technology Home: Gender and Technology in a Changing Europe (pp. 42–58). Open University Press.  
• Wajcman, J. (2018). Digital Technology Work Extension and the Acceleration Society. German Journal of Human Resource Management: Zeitschrift für Personalforschung, 32(3-4), 168–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/2397002218775930
• Wenneras, C., & Wold, A. (2001). Nepotism and Sexism in Peer-Review. In M. Lederman & I. Bartsch (Eds.), The Gender and Science Reader (pp. 42–48). Routledge.